Current:Home > ScamsTexas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status -ChatGPT
Texas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status
View
Date:2025-04-14 08:52:05
Sixteen Republican-led states are suing to end a federal program that could potentially give nearly half a million immigrants without legal status who are married to U.S. citizens a path to citizenship.
The coalition filed suit Friday to halt the program launched by President Joe Biden in June, saying in court filings that the Biden administration bypassed Congress to create a pathway to citizenship for “blatant political purposes.”
“This action incentivizes illegal immigration and will irreparably harm the Plaintiff states,” the suit says.
Under the policy, which started taking applications Monday, many spouses without legal status can apply for something called “parole in place,” offering permission to stay in the U.S., apply for a green card and eventually get on a path to citizenship.
But the program has been particularly contentious in an election year where immigration is one of the biggest issues, with many Republicans attacking the policy and contending it is essentially a form of amnesty for people who broke the law.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement Friday that the plan “violates the Constitution and actively worsens the illegal immigration disaster that is hurting Texas and our country.”
The suit filed against the Department of Homeland Security, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and other Biden administration officials accuses the agency of attempting to parole spouses “en masse,” which the states contend is an abuse of power.
The Department of Homeland Security and the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press.
The bipartisan immigration and criminal justice organization FWD.us noted the timing of the lawsuit — as Kamala Harris accepted the Democratic nomination for president — and said the program is in compliance with the law.
“The only motivation behind this lawsuit is the cruelty of tearing families apart and the crass politics of hoping a judge might do the bidding of the anti-immigrant movement,” the organization said in a statement.
To be eligible for the program, immigrants must have lived continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, not pose a security threat or have a disqualifying criminal history, and have been married to a citizen by June 17 — the day before the program was announced.
They must pay a $580 fee to apply and fill out a lengthy application, including an explanation of why they deserve humanitarian parole and a long list of supporting documents proving how long they have been in the country.
They apply to the Department of Homeland Security, and if approved, have three years to seek permanent residency. During that period, they can get work authorization. The administration estimates about 500,000 people could be eligible, plus about 50,000 of their children.
Before this program, it was complicated for people who were in the U.S. illegally to get a green card after marrying an American citizen. They can be required to return to their home country — often for years — and they always face the risk they may not be allowed back in.
veryGood! (41695)
Related
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- Kilauea, Hawaii’s second-largest volcano, is erupting again
- Former U.S. soldier charged with homicide, robbery in plot to fund fighting trip to Venezuela
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's crossword, I Just Can't Explain It (Freestyle)
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- WNBA rookie power rankings: Caitlin Clark rises, Angel Reese owns the offensive glass
- Rupert Murdoch marries for 5th time in ceremony at his California vineyard
- Monica McNutt leaves Stephen A. Smith speechless by pushing back against WNBA coverage
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- 3rd try at approving recreational marijuana in South Dakota makes the ballot
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- New Mexico primary holds implications for Legislature and prosecutor in Alec Baldwin case
- Florida won't light bridges in rainbow colors. So Jacksonville's LGBTQ community did.
- Georgia appeals court sets tentative Oct. 4 date to hear Trump appeal of Fani Willis ruling
- Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
- Adele reprimands audience member who apparently shouted anti-LGBTQ comment during Las Vegas concert
- Florida ends Oklahoma's 20-game postseason win streak with home-run barrage at WCWS
- Plug-In hybrids? Why you may want to rethink this car
Recommendation
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
Messi joins Argentina for Copa América: His stats show he's ready for another title run
In cities across the US, Black and Latino neighborhoods have less access to pharmacies
Congressman’s son steals show on House floor, hamming it up for cameras
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
Simone Biles wins 9th U.S. Championships title ahead of Olympic trials
Who will replace Pat Sajak on 'Wheel of Fortune?' Hint: He was 7 when Sajak began hosting.
In New York, Attorney General Letitia James’ Narrow View of the State’s Green Amendment