Current:Home > reviewsKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -ChatGPT
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-19 01:38:16
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (4)
Related
- Small twin
- Freed Israeli hostage recounts ordeal in Gaza, where she says she was held in a hospital and civilian homes
- In Bed-Stuy, a watermelon stand stands strong against tides of gentrification
- Ferrari has plans to sell an electric vehicle. The cost? More than $500,000.
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- Gilmore Girls' Keiko Agena Reveals She Was in “Survival Mode” While Playing Lane Kim
- Elevate Your Summer Wardrobe With the Top 34 Trending Amazon Styles Right Now
- Caitlin Clark is proving naysayers wrong. Rookie posts a double-double as Fever win
- Small twin
- Kylie Jenner Breaks Down in Tears Over Nasty Criticism of Her Looks
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- Powerful storm transformed ‘relatively flat’ New Mexico village into ‘large lake,’ forecasters say
- 2025 Honda Odyssey: Everything we know about the next minivan
- Olympic champion Tara Lipinski talks infertility journey: 'Something that I carry with me'
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- Ariana Grande addresses viral vocal change clip from podcast: 'I've always done this'
- Multiple people injured in shooting at Juneteenth celebration in Oakland, California
- Mette says Taylor Swift's 'prowess is unreal' ahead of her opening London Eras Tour slot
Recommendation
Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
Paris awaits for Sha’Carri, Lyles and dozens more, but Olympic spots must be earned at trials
Amtrack trains suspended from Philadelphia to New Haven by circuit breaker malfunction
In Bed-Stuy, a watermelon stand stands strong against tides of gentrification
Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
Barstool Sports founder Dave Portnoy announces he 'beat' cancer
TikTok unveils interactive Taylor Swift feature ahead of London Eras Tour shows
Kendrick Lamar performs Drake diss 'Not Like Us' 5 times at Juneteenth 'Pop Out' concert